[Gambas-user] sourceforge , git and gitlab, time to switch to gitlab

[Benoît Minisini]

Le 13/03/2017 à 15:16, PICCORO McKAY Lenz a écrit :
> i'm back for this land and in my firts 2017 mail to this i see some notes
> about sourgeforce
>
> 2017-02-25 20:37 GMT-04:00 Jesus Guardon <jguardon at ...3606...>:
>
>> El 25/2/17 a las 20:17, Benoît Minisini escribió:
>>> Moreover, the Sourceforge svn commit mails are still broken, they
>>> apparently haven't fixed them for weeks. Sourceforge is more and more a
>>> problem!
>> Perhaps it's time to switch to GitHub...  ;-)
>>
>>
> i best for gambas prefer gitlab due gitlab are more GPL rather github, the
> github interface are copyright and gitlab are 100% GPL and the enterprice
> services only add some services over the community..
>
> so when we use the gitlab ui service we follow gpl guidelines, also helps a
> great project that share their ui code, either github not!
>
> * and a important difference, github projects are a sub.item of github
> repos.. that are confuse!
> * in gitlab, the repository its a subitem of a project, so the organization
> are more proper!
>
> also gitlab offers mirror git autocommit to other repositories so we can
> sync the older sourceforge using svn hook and mirror git, gitlab does not
> offer automatic mirror commits, only using git remote configuration inside
> repository.
>
> these 3 main reason means that gitlab are better.. and the right choice
>
> Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
> http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

Sebastian Kuelez prefers github: maybe he can give his arguments on the 
mailing-list?

Anyway, whatever repository is chosen, the only problem I have is how to 
import the svn commit history with the user that did the commit, as 
these users won't exist in the new git repository.

-- 
Benoît Minisini