[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Before releasing Gambas 3.21.4 - Timers test failure


Am 10.03.26 um 23:02 schrieb Benoît Minisini:

Not sure, but if they are taken from the tests I made, they check if the
commands work as expected.
I don't think Sleep command should be interruptible, Wait is for that.
There should be some tolerance for rounding up.


Jussi


I checked, and indeed the Sleep instruction repeats the system call
until the specified time elapses.

So the difference between the specified time and the actual duration of
the instruction should come from the system.

The tests are not in the 'Production' nor in the 'Fast' test suite which are IMO the important ones. I would keep them. My VM which produced the failures is really really slow.

The tests come from Jussi, maybe he can adapt them so that they are a bit more sloppy and forgiving also on very slow machines.

Alles Gute

Christof Thalhofer

--
Dies ist keine Signatur


References:
Before releasing Gambas 3.21.4Benoît Minisini <benoit.minisini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Before releasing Gambas 3.21.4 - IDE http freezeChristof Thalhofer <chrisml@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Before releasing Gambas 3.21.4 - IDE http freezeBenoît Minisini <benoit.minisini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Before releasing Gambas 3.21.4 - IDE http freezeChristof Thalhofer <chrisml@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Before releasing Gambas 3.21.4 - Timers test failureChristof Thalhofer <chrisml@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Before releasing Gambas 3.21.4 - Timers test failureChristof Thalhofer <chrisml@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Before releasing Gambas 3.21.4 - Timers test failureBenoît Minisini <benoit.minisini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Before releasing Gambas 3.21.4 - Timers test failureJussi Lahtinen <jussi.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: Before releasing Gambas 3.21.4 - Timers test failureBenoît Minisini <benoit.minisini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>