Re: Before releasing Gambas 3.21.4 - Timers test failure

[Jussi Lahtinen <jussi.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxx>]

> Indeed. I don't know what these tests are supposed to check. Especially
> the Timer test #5, which fails if the 'Sleep' instruction does now wait
> the specified time.
>
> This is stupid, as by definition, sleeping can be interrupted, and so
> may not wait at all, and the duration of the sleep may be rounded up,
> depending how the system behaves.
>
> I think this test should be removed.
>

Not sure, but if they are taken from the tests I made, they check if the
commands work as expected.
I don't think Sleep command should be interruptible, Wait is for that.
There should be some tolerance for rounding up.


Jussi