Re: Another possible gb.poppler bug?

[gbWilly <gbWilly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tuesday, December 2nd, 2025 at 18:24, Lee <t.lee.davidson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 12/2/25 11:26 AM, Claus Dietrich wrote:
> 
> > Have a look by yourself. I loaded both PDFs up into my cloud: https://magentacloud.de/s/4TJeHaqcgQbNKri
> 
> 
> Thank you for that, Claus.
> 
> Finally, definitive evidence that https://pdfux.com/inspect-pdf/ can be used to determine if a PDF has embedded thumbnails.
> 
> 
> @gbWilly, I uploaded both of Claus' PDFs to that site. I've attached two screenshots that plainly show that one does have
> "Thumb" references, and the other does not.
> 
> If you wish, you can upload "F16866_TUF_GAMING_B460-PLUS_UM_V2_WEB.pdf" to that site. It presents the information in a tree
> view. Just drill down until you get into the "Kids" Array (be aware that this file has a nested "Kids" array that you'll also
> need to expand). I did this, and this particular PDF has no "Thumb" references.
> 
> I hope this helps you have confidence that gb.poppler is behaving correctly.
> 

I was already convinced, but thanks a lot for this info and screens.
You've been of great help as has Claus in getting some better insight in pdf files (graphics is not my core business, so I never really dived into it all).


gbWilly

GambOS
Gambas3 for Debian/Ubuntu

...there is always a Catch if things go wrong!

Sent with Proton Mail secure email.