[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Problem "Stable" is not stable



Le 29/08/2024 à 14:43, BB a écrit :
On 29/8/24 9:17 pm, Stéphane AULERY wrote:
If Laurux explicitly documented its compatibility with Gamabs versions there would be no need to send stimuli.


The stimulus that I have always felt due towards users who dont consult the developers of their mission critical systems and just "update everything" is about 30kV though the keyboard. 😁

LOL

--
Stéphane Aulery

References:
Problem "Stable" is not stableChristof Thalhofer <chrisml@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Problem "Stable" is not stableBenoît Minisini <benoit.minisini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Problem "Stable" is not stableStéphane Aulery <lkppo@xxxxxxx>
Re: Problem "Stable" is not stableBB <adamnt42@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: Problem "Stable" is not stableStéphane AULERY <lkppo@xxxxxxx>
Re: Problem "Stable" is not stableBB <adamnt42@xxxxxxxxx>