[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Problem "Stable" is not stable
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Problem "Stable" is not stable
- From: BB <adamnt42@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 22:13:21 +0930
- To: user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 29/8/24 9:17 pm, Stéphane AULERY wrote:
If Laurux explicitly documented its compatibility with Gamabs versions there would be no need to send stimuli.
The stimulus that I have always felt due towards users who dont consult the developers of their mission critical systems and just "update everything" is about 30kV though the keyboard. 😁
Re: Problem "Stable" is not stable | Stéphane AULERY <lkppo@xxxxxxx> |
Problem "Stable" is not stable | Christof Thalhofer <chrisml@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Re: Problem "Stable" is not stable | Benoît Minisini <benoit.minisini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Re: Problem "Stable" is not stable | Stéphane Aulery <lkppo@xxxxxxx> |
Re: Problem "Stable" is not stable | BB <adamnt42@xxxxxxxxx> |
Re: Problem "Stable" is not stable | Stéphane AULERY <lkppo@xxxxxxx> |