[Gambas-user] Gambas-dev? (vs gambas-devel)

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

El dom, 25 de abr. de 2021 a la(s) 18:04, Tim Dickson via User (
user at lists.gambas-basic.org) escribió:

> no dev/devel complications. No worries there for component package
> names, as there are none.
>
slpit is for security and slim, deploys need only nedded things ,,by
example gambas webs.. dont need x11 modules neither wayland ones


>
> On 23/04/2021 13:44, T Lee Davidson wrote:
> > On 4/22/21 7:19 PM, Bruce wrote:
> >> "gambas-devtools" or whatever, suits me. It looks like something
> >> special
> >> and I would be reading the comments in the RPM file to find out more.
> >
> > That's a naming format I didn't think of previously. So I did another
> > search on openSUSE.
> >
> > `zypper se devtools`
> > S | Name             | Summary | Type
> >
> --+------------------+---------------------------------------------+--------
>
> >
> >   | linuxrc-devtools | Tools to submit from Git to OBS via Jenkins |
> > package
> >   | rpmdevtools      | RPM Development Tools | package
> >   | yast2-devtools   | YaST2 - Development Tools | package
> >
> > So, yep, developers use that convention as well. And, the Summary
> > clarifies it.
> >
> > Personally, it doesn't much matter to me. Since the SPEC file
> > indicates gambas3-devel is required, I know it's ... required. But,
> > "*dev*tools" is more descriptive.
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> https://www.avg.com
>
>
> ----[ http://gambaswiki.org/wiki/doc/netiquette ]----
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gambas-basic.org/pipermail/user/attachments/20210426/09328d5c/attachment-0001.htm>