[Gambas-user] Question again about git in the aim of next Gambas release

[Adrien Prokopowicz]

Le 14/02/2018 à 23:10, Christof Thalhofer a écrit :
> Am 14.02.2018 um 22:41 schrieb Adrien Prokopowicz:
> 
>> That's right. :-)
> 
> :-) Thank you!
> 
>> I was making the assumption that at least either local or remote would
>> be up-to-date (since Benoît makes the vast majority of the commits
>> anyway), but you never know, it's better to make a full synchronization
>> just in case!
> 
> Would you like to talk a little about Git workflow? I wonder why the
> Gambas branch model is unusual. As I know it, normally development
> happens in a branch called "devel", while master is the branch, where
> stable versions and hotfixes reside:
> 
> https://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/
> 
> Is there a reason, why at Gambas it's the other way round?
> 
> 
> Alles Gute
> 
> Christof Thalhofer

I've actually seen (and used) both, but this one is, I feel, easier to 
use given the original workflow.

Unless explicitely stated otherwise, I found most people to expect the 
default master branch to be the development one (which maps to SVN's 
trunk), and I don't really see the need to change it (you can probably 
find my exact words by searching for 'git' on the old ML's archives).

That's about it, other than that it isn't much different from 
traditional workflows. :-)

-- 
Adrien Prokopowicz