[Gambas-user] An other OO problem.

[nando]

And so, a new copy of references to objects still point the objects


---------- Original Message -----------
From: Benoit Minisini <gambas at ...1...>
To: mailing list for gambas users <gambas-user at lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:59:52 +0100
Subject: Re: [Gambas-user] An other OO problem.

> On lundi 19 janvier 2009, Jussi Lahtinen wrote:
> > If I have understand concept correctly, I think this;
> > http://gambasdoc.org/help/comp/gb/object%5B%5D/copy
> > is little misleading.
> > "Returns a deep copy of the array."
> > Objects copied with this method doesn't seem to be deep copied
> > (shallow copy instead).
> >
> >
> > Jussi
> >
> 
> I wanted to mean that the returned array is a new object, and that the array 
> contents is copied. But if the array contents are object references, objects 
> are not copied (there is no way to tell Gambas how to copy objects), only the 
> references are.
> 
> Is "shallow copy" really the right term then?
> 
> -- 
> Benoit Minisini
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by:
> SourcForge Community
> SourceForge wants to tell your story.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
> _______________________________________________
> Gambas-user mailing list
> Gambas-user at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
------- End of Original Message -------