[Gambas-user] Documentation glitch with Iconview ?
manuel viet
gambas at ...1828...
Tue Jan 8 23:38:03 CET 2008
Fabien Bodard-4 wrote:
>
> Le Tuesday 08 January 2008 21:12:56 Benoit Minisini, vous avez écrit :
>> On mardi 8 janvier 2008, Fabien Bodard wrote:
>> > Le Tuesday 08 January 2008 19:37:06 Benoit Minisini, vous avez écrit :
>> > > On mardi 8 janvier 2008, manuel viet wrote:
>> > > > I understand you've already plenty to do with the code
>> > > > cleanup and the 64 bits support, but I really think it
>> > > > would be a major bonus if Gambas could load custom
>> > > > controls in the IDE at runtime ; many time, you just
>> > > > don't have the possibility to build a full application,
>> > > > but you somehow have tiny ideas that are ideal to
>> > > > improve or create a control. Or you don't finish a
>> > > > project, but there are already classes that could just
>> > > > be spin off. If people could toy around and exchange
>> > > > seamlessly those bits and pieces of code it could
>> > > > create a great incentive toward gb.
>>
>> > maybe another thing is missing...
>> >
>> > the ability to have a name space for the comonents... if custom
>> > components are made it reduce the luck to have classes or function
>> > conflict...
>> >
>> > And in the case where we want to 'surclass'<fr> a class we have juste
>> to
>> > give the same namespace.
>>
>> I don't want namespaces. I can't stand them. Do real languages have
>> namespaces? Not really.
>>
>> If two components export classes having the same name, there is no
>> conflict
>> in Gambas, there is inheritance. If they have the same name, they should
>> mean the same thing.
>
> :/
> not sure in the case of users components... how to be sure that users not
> use
> a component with another ... that have not reason to be .... i'm not
> affraid
> for the first level developper but for the second level one...
>
>
I side with Benoit on this one ; who cares if 2 user components are
conflicting ? If they share the same name, there's a big chance
they're doing the same job. The application writer choses the one
he prefers. It's all about empowering normal users ; making them
contribute, showing them how easy it is to realize an idea. It's
not like it would corrupt the official tree.
-----
--
Manuel Viet
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Documentation-glitch-with-Iconview---tp14692094p14700580.html
Sent from the gambas-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the User
mailing list