[Gambas-user] I'm thinking...

[Daniel Campos]

Well, it is sure that I'll will break things in the GTK+ component, and
probably my current (not yet released) XML implementation, but I suppose
I'll be able to fix the code without very much problems, it will even help
to free data attached to some controls once they are not valid...

Regards,

D. Campos

2006/1/3, Benoit Minisini <gambas at ...1...>:
>
> You know probably that an object in Gambas has a constructor named '_new',
> and
> a destructor named '_free'.
>
> At the moment, '_free' is called just before the object is released.
>
> Now, you know probably too that an object in Gambas can become "invalid".
> An
> invalid object cannot be used anymore, but it is referenced again.
>
> I'm currently thinking about calling '_free' when an object becomes
> invalid
> (and then not calling it when the object is released of course).
>
> There are advantages... But I'm not sure it won't break some things in
> native
> classes (I will see) or in your Gambas code.
>
> So, what do you think about that? Do you use '_free'? What for? Tell me if
> you
> see any problem in this design change.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Benoit Minisini
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log
> files
> for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
> searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Gambas-user mailing list
> Gambas-user at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gambas-basic.org/pipermail/user/attachments/20060103/1742a811/attachment.html>