[Gambas-user] Need to have blowfish en- and decryption
Brant Wells
bwells at ...475...
Wed Jul 14 19:37:53 CEST 2004
Hey Rob.
All encryption is meant to be cracked! ;-) ... Some form of encryption
would actually be better than none at all, or even a low-level
encryption. With a new encryption method, hackers that are unware as to
the encryption type used, would have to hunt and peck at the encrypted
data for a while before they could make any sense of it -- especially if
it's an un-published algorythm, or formula, etc.
And on the security note, I woudln't expect somebody to use this on like
a top-secret government computer requiring 1024-bit encryiption,
either... At least not until I [we] had a chance to really test the
encryption.... [grin]... I do understand, and fully believe that
security is a *REAL* issue... especially in the linux world...
I'm working on porting the blowfish to a gambas class now... So far, I
have about 10 lines of code... but I will keep everyone posted as I get
it thrown together...
See Ya!
~Brant
Rob wrote:
>On Wednesday 14 July 2004 09:09, Brant Wells wrote:
>
>
>>functions, like the RTLMoveMemory... But I also don't see the
>>problem with creating our own 'encryption' routines just for
>>Gambas...
>>
>>
>
>In fact, I think rolling your own "crypto" and then releasing it
>for general consumption by gambas users would be significantly
>worse than the current situation where there's no crypto in
>gambas at all. This is because it would give gambas users who
>might not know any better a false sense of security when using a
>weak and untested cipher. You might as well implement rot13
>because at least then no one expects it to be uncrackable.
>
>I gotta think Schneier mentions this concept somewhere on his
>site, maybe in a FAQ or something. Implementing blowfish as a
>Gambas component or library seems like it would be a great first
>step towards full crypto support in gambas though (with the
>ultimate goal being a GPG component that managed keys and
>everything... far off in the future. ;) )
>
>Not a crypto expert here, just been exposed to a lot of security
>pitfalls over the years at various system administrator gigs.
>
>Rob
>
>
More information about the User
mailing list