[Gambas-user] Printing
Radoslav Dejanovic
radoslav.dejanovic at ...116...
Tue May 27 08:58:30 CEST 2003
On Tuesday 27 May 2003 04:35 am, Ken Schrock wrote:
> >But perhaps we should wait for Gambas to get some maturity on Linux
> > platform first, before migrating to other platforms?
> You mean wait until Gambas is big and ugly like VB 4.0 before it is ported?
No, I'd be happy if it could compile out of the box on my SuSE :))
This is the first thing why we should consider Gambas immature at this point.
While the language and underlying algorythms might be perfect, the fact that
it doesn't compile out of the box is really bad thing. It prevents language
from being included with distributions (SuSE has only some old release,
perhaps because of building troubles?), and the rapid development stage (as
is happening now) will prevent everyone but experienced programmer from
giving it a try.
So what we have here, as I see it, are two things: disability to compile out
of the box, which is a bad, bad thing, and fast development, which is just
great. But these two do make Gambas immature. The first step should be
to try to solve building showstoppers.
--
Radoslav Dejanović
Operacijski sustavi d.o.o. http://www.opsus.hr
More information about the User
mailing list