[Fwd: Re: [Gambas-user] Questions]

[Ken Schrock]

Appearantly a difference of opinion

I believe, even in this development stage environment
It would have been nice to have milestones (say 0.48, 0.58, 0.68)
So that all development work isn't like the dog chasing his tail

I also find it detractive to both Gambas' development and adaption
That everybody not using Mandrake has to struggle to use it

For something to improve, it needs critics as well as cheerleaders

OMHO

On Thursday 25 December 2003 10:17 am, daniel wrote:
> > At least the Lindows method allows some "standard"
> > They had 0.53 and now 0.62, which is only two versions
> > Except for the 20 people on this list who always have the "current" one
> > Most of the folks out in the real world got whatever version they got
> > And it is hard as hell writing software for 100 possible versions
> >
> > Gambas needs...
> > 1. A real "stable" version for people to work against
>
> mmmhh... OK, but before you have an stable version, you need to program
> it, and that's what people (mainly Benoît) is doing now, remember that
> alpha and beta versions of any software are intended only for testing
> pourposes, so I don't undestand at all why you need to program for 100
> versions; just play with them and learn more about this new Basic. There
> will be time in the future for a 1.0 version and big programs written
> with that stable platform...
>
>  People of big companies like RedHat or Mandrake uses to put unstable
> versions of new software: remember thar RedHat suffered a lot with its
> 7.0 Linux distribution due to gcc and kernel, but there was not a
> problem of gcc nor kernel people, they saw in big capital letters that
> it was an unstable version, so there was possible changes and bugs. What
> we should do now? Stop Gambas developement because Lindows folks decided
> to include 0.53 in its distribution? Remember that Gambas people are not
> Lindows employees, they (we) are trying to write a really good
> developement tool, but it need more work, and changes if neccesary
>
> > 2. The ability to easily install on most major Linux distros
>
> Some people are working on it, you already have easy packages for
> Mandrake, and other distributions will come soon, I suppose, as Benoît
> has been adding lot of changes at MakeFiles to allow compile in
> many distributions...
>
> > The "killer" would be a Win version
> > Gambas is easy and powerful and logical
> > It could be the oft promised but never delivered
> > Holy grail of programming, a true cross platform development tool
>
> Yes, this is true, and Gambas-Cygwin begins to work. More people that
> can help on it? They will be very welcome!
>
> Another possibility would be a Windows native version, but al least
> all graphical part should be rewritten, as QT for Windows is not free at
> all (may be the GTK or wxWindows component would be the cross-platform
> answer), and of course all the network part using Winsock...
>
> But remember that Gambas, in fact, is already cross-platform, as it
> begins to compile and run on Solaris and FreeBSD. I mean cross-platform
> does not mean Windows-Linux at all (do not forget OS/2 is still alive in
> many computers)
>
> Regards,
>
> Daniel Campos
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
> Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
> Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
> Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id78&alloc_id371&op,ick
> _______________________________________________
> Gambas-user mailing list
> Gambas-user at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user