[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fedora Gambas packages
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Fedora Gambas packages
- From: Olivier Cruilles <olivier.cruilles@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 17:22:34 -0400
- To: Mailing List Gambas <user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Cc: Olivier Cruilles <olivier.cruilles@xxxxxxxx>
In fact Bruce, it’s me who is doing the work to include Fedora spec into OBS format/procedure as we discussed with Benoit. So I will continue in the same way we decide in the first time. Thx Benoit Olivier > Le 23 avr. 2026 à 17:17, Bruce Steers <bsteers4@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > > apparently all that's needed is a .spec file. > > here's the one from that fedora rpms page Oliver pointed to.. > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gambas3/blob/rawhide/f/gambas3.spec > > Maybe it makes sense to you Benoit and you might be able to use / modify it to add fedora to OBS? > > Respects > BruceS > > On Thu, 23 Apr 2026 at 21:35, Benoît Minisini <benoit.minisini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:benoit.minisini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >> Le 23/04/2026 à 17:09, Olivier Cruilles a écrit : >> > Hi Benoit, >> > >> > I back to you regarding the discussion we had about adding the Fedora >> > build spec file into the process of OBS, and by this way be able to >> > propose Fedora Gambas packages like others Debian, Ubuntu, Arch and >> > OpenSuse distribution. >> > >> > In fact during my research I found this web site where all Fedora Gambas >> > packages are already built and available. >> > >> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gambas3 >> > >> > Did you be aware about that ? >> > >> > Just to have your opinion on that. Do we just add this site in the >> > Gambas Wiki as reference for user on Fedora Linux distributions, or do >> > we continue on the way to include the build on OBS like we discussed ? >> > >> > Thank you >> > >> > Olivier >> >> It's necessary for three reasons: >> >> 1) The official packages of Gambas in the distribution are almost always >> incorrect. They must follow a structure described in the wiki, so that >> the IDE packager works. Of course, who am I to prevent a packager from >> doing what he wants and break the project it packages? >> >> 2) We can provide packages for older versions of distributions. The >> distributions usually do not care with their old versions. >> >> 3) Thanks to the 'gambas-package-config' project, adding the packages >> for a new component for all distributions normally takes less than one hour. >> >> As for the official Fedora packages, I don't remember if they are >> correct or not. Must look. But I guess they are not. :-) >> >> Regards, >> >> -- >> Benoît Minisini. >> >>
| Fedora Gambas packages | Olivier Cruilles <olivier.cruilles@xxxxxxxx> |
| Re: Fedora Gambas packages | Benoît Minisini <benoit.minisini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Re: Fedora Gambas packages | Bruce Steers <bsteers4@xxxxxxxxx> |