Re: Looping through an array with FOR EACH

[Gianluigi <gradobag@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Il 16/01/26 16:49, Gianluigi ha scritto:
> Il 16/01/26 15:55, Brian G ha scritto:
> > Out of interest to see just how bad time wise using for each was, I 
> > put together a little test and was quite surprised by the result:
> >
> > Ranking of each type of iteration by time
> >
> > 1       For each hybrid Time= 0.758384959, Total=9000003 
> > 0.758384959073737
> > 2       Index only      Time= 0.837044355, total=9000003 0.83704435499385
> > 3       for each only   Time= 1.282145344, Total=9000003 1.28214534395374
> >
> > The short program is below.
> > It look like a combination of both types together depending on the 
> > array structure is best!
>
>
> On my over 5-year-old PC (which I built myself 🤪 ), these are the 
> results of your test:
>
> Ranking of each type by time
> 1       For each hybrid Time= 0,461964985, Total=9000003 0,461964984999213
> 2       Index only      Time= 0,467335708, total=9000003 0,467335707999155
> 3       for each only   Time= 0,811512829, Total=9000003 0,811512829001003

Hi Brian,

I've done various tests, even added a 0(*), and I'd say the hybrid is 
always faster.

Regards
Gianluigi

(*) Ranking of each type by time
1       For each hybrid Time= 4,945550591, Total=90000003 
4,9455505909973
2       Index only      Time= 5,238530005, total=90000003 
5,23853000500094
3       for each only   Time= 8,906546153, Total=90000003 
8,90654615300082