[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Another possible gb.poppler bug?


Am 02.12.25 um 16:55 schrieb gbWilly:
If they always render themselves, what could well be seeing the quality, they do a visual way faster rendering job than gambas is even able to! What could be causing that is my next question then?

A good question. It seems that XReader is written in C and Okular in C++. This might explain some of my observations but I would prefer to make some concrete tests to quantify some of the brake effects. The 1000-pages PDF as referenced by Gianluigi in his video would be a nice file to start with. I feel comfortable with the speed of my PDF viewer and I don't want to compete with XReader or Okular. I developed it as a PDF viewer in one of my Gambas applications. It is supposed to display up to ~50 pages without embedded thumbnails, which is a piece of cake for it.

Best regards , Claus





Follow-Ups:
Re: Another possible gb.poppler bug?gbWilly <gbWilly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:
Another possible gb.poppler bug?gbWilly <gbWilly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Another possible gb.poppler bug?Claus Dietrich <claus.dietrich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Another possible gb.poppler bug?gbWilly <gbWilly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Another possible gb.poppler bug?Claus Dietrich <claus.dietrich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Another possible gb.poppler bug?gbWilly <gbWilly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Another possible gb.poppler bug?Claus Dietrich <claus.dietrich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Another possible gb.poppler bug?gbWilly <gbWilly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>