[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Another possible gb.poppler bug?


Le 02/12/2025 à 16:55, gbWilly a écrit :

On Tuesday, December 2nd, 2025 at 12:50, Claus Dietrich
<claus.dietrich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Am 02.12.25 um 12:16 schrieb gbWilly:

The LibreOffice documents exported as pdf, do show thumbs in
other pdfviewers, I have to self render them in my pdfviewer.


LibreOffice never generates thumbnails when exporting documents to
PDF and how do you know that the standard PDF viewers found
embedded thumbnails and display them instead of self rending?

I don't, I thought I made that clear, it just SEEMS like they do
because of the speed they load and render the thumbnails on the
spot.

As Gianluigi points out, if you self render a pdf with 1000 pages,
it takes quite a while, might even hang on older systems, where
other pdfviewers show thumbnails in a second (I presume also self
rendered after all I read). So, in other pdfviewers they are fully
rendered during the opening the file.

Now, I can play a bit with when I render, to ensure the document is
shown, before starting rendering the thumbs. But during rendering,
even a timer object doesn't trigger, as the whole application seems
to be caught up in the rendering. So showing the document first,
gives some visible comfort to the user, but you can't do shit until
the rendering is finished. Fact is that this self rendering is much
slower than the self rendering other pdfviewers seem to be able to
do.


Again, it's slow because you render all the thumbnails when opening the PDF, which is silly. You must render the thumbnails only when needed.

--
Benoît Minisini.


Follow-Ups:
Re: Another possible gb.poppler bug?Claus Dietrich <claus.dietrich@xxxxxxxxxx>
References:
Another possible gb.poppler bug?gbWilly <gbWilly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Another possible gb.poppler bug?Claus Dietrich <claus.dietrich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Another possible gb.poppler bug?gbWilly <gbWilly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Another possible gb.poppler bug?Claus Dietrich <claus.dietrich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Another possible gb.poppler bug?gbWilly <gbWilly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Another possible gb.poppler bug?Claus Dietrich <claus.dietrich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Another possible gb.poppler bug?gbWilly <gbWilly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>