[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Possible gb.poppler bug
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Possible gb.poppler bug
- From: gbWilly <gbWilly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2025 16:12:19 +0000
- To: Gianluigi <gradobag@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Cc: user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Saturday, November 29th, 2025 at 16:46, Gianluigi <gradobag@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > I made a disturbing discovery. > Even PDF files in 1.4 format can cause the same problem. > Convinced that, like the others, it was in 1.7 format, the file > indicated to Benoit (which cannot be downloaded here) is in 1.4 format, > see attached image. > But like those posted on Pastebin (1.6 and 1.7), the page number is not > returned! > So it's not the format number that matters, but how it was formatted? > Strange, that file works for me, just downloaded a fresh copy and it gave me an index with pages working. What application did you use to test? There could be a bug in there. Try to use the second PdfTest source archive I added in my previous post and see what that does. gbWilly GambOS Gambas3 for Debian/Ubuntu ...there is always a Catch if things go wrong!
| Re: Possible gb.poppler bug | Gianluigi <gradobag@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Possible gb.poppler bug | gbWilly <gbWilly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Re: Possible gb.poppler bug | gbWilly <gbWilly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Re: Possible gb.poppler bug | Claus Dietrich <claus.dietrich@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Re: Possible gb.poppler bug | gbWilly <gbWilly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Re: Possible gb.poppler bug | Claus Dietrich <claus.dietrich@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Re: Possible gb.poppler bug | Gianluigi <gradobag@xxxxxxxxxxx> |