[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Possible gb.poppler bug


On Saturday, November 29th, 2025 at 16:46, Gianluigi <gradobag@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I made a disturbing discovery.
> Even PDF files in 1.4 format can cause the same problem.
> Convinced that, like the others, it was in 1.7 format, the file
> indicated to Benoit (which cannot be downloaded here) is in 1.4 format,
> see attached image.
> But like those posted on Pastebin (1.6 and 1.7), the page number is not
> returned!
> So it's not the format number that matters, but how it was formatted?
> 

Strange, that file works for me, just downloaded a fresh copy and it gave me an index with pages working.

What application did you use to test? There could be a bug in there.
Try to use the second PdfTest source archive I added in my previous post and see what that does.

gbWilly

GambOS
Gambas3 for Debian/Ubuntu

...there is always a Catch if things go wrong!


Follow-Ups:
Re: Possible gb.poppler bugGianluigi <gradobag@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References:
Possible gb.poppler buggbWilly <gbWilly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Possible gb.poppler buggbWilly <gbWilly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Possible gb.poppler bugClaus Dietrich <claus.dietrich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Possible gb.poppler buggbWilly <gbWilly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Possible gb.poppler bugClaus Dietrich <claus.dietrich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Possible gb.poppler bugGianluigi <gradobag@xxxxxxxxxxx>