[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Gambas and Wayland


Too much ego not enough common sense from the wayland team who just happen to control the desktop completely at the moment.
my red hat is off!

On 8/2/25 07:59, Jussi Lahtinen wrote:
* Those who understand history are doomed to watch others repeating it.

Jussi


On Sat, 2 Aug 2025, 15:28 BB, <adamnt42@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

    Only one thought, "those that do not understand history are doomed to
    repeat it".

    b

    On 31/7/25 1:59 am, Benoît Minisini wrote:
    > Hi,
    >
    > I just read that page, named "Think twice before abandoning X11.
    > Wayland breaks everything!".
    >
    > https://gist.github.com/probonopd/9feb7c20257af5dd915e3a9f2d1f2277
    >
    > As you may know, Gambas tries to create an uniform API for
    accessing
    > GUI toolkits, i.e. Qt and GTK+ at the moment.
    >
    > I had to introduce in both of them some sort of specific
    > sub-components to handle the difference between X11 and Wayland:
    > gb.qt6.wayland, gb.qt6.x11, gb.gtk3.wayland, and so on...
    >
    > And by making these components, I noticed that a lot of things
    are not
    > implemented in Wayland.
    >
    > At the beginning, I thought these missing features will be
    implemented
    > in the future, that they were not there because of more prioritary
    > things to do first.
    >
    > But then I noticed that Wayland has now the same age than Xorg had
    > when the development of Wayland started.
    >
    > And I read the document I mentioned at the beginning of the mail.
    >
    > Now I'm afraid that Wayland will never be fixed, and will be
    imposed
    > by force to the user. The exact contrary of the spirit of free
    software.
    >
    > And I even not talking about the politic drama around the XLibre
    fork.
    >
    > I don't want to spend hours of coding just to try to workaround
    > Wayland limitations and the resulting incompatibilities between
    each
    > Wayland window manager implementations and their "desktop portal
    > thing", whereas on X11 all window managers speaks the same language.
    >
    > There are some bad designs too in some of X11 protocols, but why
    not
    > just fixing them?
    >
    > What do you think?
    >



--
~~~~ Brian

Attachment: OpenPGP_0x78BFB26402F48419.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


References:
Re: Gambas and WaylandBB <adamnt42@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: Gambas and WaylandJussi Lahtinen <jussi.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxx>