Re: Pretty change !

["aishen@xxxxxxx" <aishen@xxxxxxx>]

For a long time I used fedora too and suze as well, my choice was guided 
by the compilation of sage which is the easiest possible on manjaro ! I 
don't know endeavorOS when I have a free ssd and time I will have a 
look... I like testing !

regards

Le 15/02/2025 à 18:30, Gianluigi a écrit :
> Il 15/02/25 17:26, T Lee Davidson ha scritto:
> > On 2/15/25 11:06 AM, aishen@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > > And I read on this list that manjaro was better ?  I didn't notice it
> > > but after few months I really find it best !
> >
> > Manjaro is based on Arch packages (while Ubuntu is based on Debian).
> >
> > Manjaro's unstable branch is synced to Arch's stable releases. Then
> > there are are a few Manjaro-specific additions and also a period for
> > further testing before the packages are released to the stable branch.
> > This can cause problems when using packages from the Arch User
> > Repository (AUR) due to the AUR package being updated but the Manjaro
> > stable packages have not yet caught up to be version compatible. This
> > may or may not be an issue depending upon how heavily a Manjaro user
> > relies on the AUR.
> >
> > If one wishes to be closer to the Arch stable releases while still
> > having a graphical installer and other more user-friendly configuration
> > management tools, EndeavorOS may be worth a look. There also would be no
> > issue with using the AUR as there may be with Manjaro.
> Endeavour is more difficult than Manjaro and I think he does not have
> the recovery of default (it is necessary to install him from Aur :-))
> that saves your lifein a rolling release.
> As a clumsy, with Mint I feel good, but if in the future I had problems,
> Fedora could be an alternative and if someone likes KDE from version 42
> goes from Spin to Edition.
> Without offense for the excellent Suse but I of Microsoft ... ;-D
>
> Regards
> Gianluigi