Re: Pretty change !

[Gianluigi <gradobag@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Il 15/02/25 17:26, T Lee Davidson ha scritto:
> On 2/15/25 11:06 AM, aishen@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > And I read on this list that manjaro was better ?  I didn't notice it
> > but after few months I really find it best !
>
> Manjaro is based on Arch packages (while Ubuntu is based on Debian).
>
> Manjaro's unstable branch is synced to Arch's stable releases. Then
> there are are a few Manjaro-specific additions and also a period for
> further testing before the packages are released to the stable branch.
> This can cause problems when using packages from the Arch User
> Repository (AUR) due to the AUR package being updated but the Manjaro
> stable packages have not yet caught up to be version compatible. This
> may or may not be an issue depending upon how heavily a Manjaro user
> relies on the AUR.
>
> If one wishes to be closer to the Arch stable releases while still
> having a graphical installer and other more user-friendly configuration
> management tools, EndeavorOS may be worth a look. There also would be no
> issue with using the AUR as there may be with Manjaro.
Endeavour is more difficult than Manjaro and I think he does not have
the recovery of default (it is necessary to install him from Aur :-))
that saves your lifein a rolling release.
As a clumsy, with Mint I feel good, but if in the future I had problems,
Fedora could be an alternative and if someone likes KDE from version 42
goes from Spin to Edition.
Without offense for the excellent Suse but I of Microsoft ... ;-D

Regards
Gianluigi