[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fw: Re: A possibly clever idea...
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
- Subject: Fw: Re: A possibly clever idea...
- From: gbWilly <gbWilly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 09:59:48 +0000
- To: Gambas Mailing List <user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Oeps didn't reply all so only Jussi got the reply From: gbWilly <gbWilly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: On Thursday, October 10th, 2024 at 11:58 Subject: Re: A possibly clever idea... To: Jussi Lahtinen <jussi.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxx> > On Thursday, October 10th, 2024 at 03:09, Jussi Lahtinen <jussi.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I absolutely hate docker, flatpak, snap, appimage, etc. > > +1 to that... > All crappy concepts and we see more of that appearing in the linux community (like wayland for example) > >>> Then all I require on my local system is to download the almost built source code and get the dependencies needed to run make install. > > I prefer making decent .deb packages that are put in an own repo and I have my reasons for that. It makes distribution of developed gambas application go smooth and integrates perfect with the rest of the packages available in official distro repo. > > I noticed that if I compile and install from source on my system gambas works well, BUT. > > If I install a .deb file of a gambas application on a self compiled system, the whole debain dependency system doesn't see the installed gambas because it is compiled from source and not installed using their package management software (like apt, dpkg etc) . > > So self compiled and installed gambas only good for testing something new in master. > > My 2 cents > > gbWilly > [Gambas3 for Debian](https://gitlab.com/gbWilly/gambas3-debian-repository)
A possibly clever idea... | Bruce Steers <bsteers4@xxxxxxxxx> |
Re: A possibly clever idea... | Jussi Lahtinen <jussi.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxx> |