[Gambas-user] Fwd: More speed for you... again.
BB
adamnt42 at gmail.com
Sat Oct 7 08:12:26 CEST 2023
On 7/10/23 2:01 am, Benoît Minisini wrote:
> Le 06/10/2023 à 16:02, Benoît Minisini a écrit :
>> Le 06/10/2023 à 12:44, BB a écrit :
>>> Then again, I just ran a few projects through the IDE with the
>>> profiler both off and on. These projects I selected have reasonably
>>> complex datasets that are read from text files, parsed and displayed
>>> in a tree. Without the profiler I would say that they "feel" quicker
>>> but with the profiler turned on they are much slower than previously
>>> when run with the profiler. So I assume that the profiler is not
>>> very "optimized" as yet.
>>>
>>> In these projects, I read and parse about 2800 text files that
>>> represent "configurations" which results in about 5400 actual
>>> objects over 30 or so classes. The time to load previously was about
>>> 6 seconds, most of which was as said above the time taken to execute
>>> the "new" methods (actual or implied). Now the load time (without
>>> the profiler) appears to be about 2 secs, but with the profiler it
>>> is over 15 secs. Whereas running them previously with the profiler
>>> turned on was about 8 seconds.
>>>
>>> I admit that these "times" are subjective but hmmmm maybe the
>>> profiling code, which is a long lamented (and neglected?) Gambas
>>> utility could take a bit of looking at?
>>>
>>> regards
>>>
>>> b
>>>
>>
>> I didn't touch to the profiling code at all. But the gcc compiler can
>> do really strange things... Do you recover the speed if you use the
>> stable version of Gambas?
>>
>
> I don't see the profiler being especially slower as before... You need
> to send me a project that reproduces the problem!
>
Well, I went back to the stable and the execution times for the profiler
are about the same. So I went back a way earlier and 😅 the profiler
times are about the same. I guess it was a subjective "think".
sorry
b
More information about the User
mailing list