[Gambas-user] Fwd: More speed for you... again.

Benoît Minisini benoit.minisini at gambas-basic.org
Fri Oct 6 16:02:35 CEST 2023


Le 06/10/2023 à 12:44, BB a écrit :
> Then again, I just ran a few projects through the IDE with the profiler 
> both off and on. These projects I selected have reasonably complex 
> datasets that are read from text files, parsed and displayed in a tree. 
> Without the profiler I would say that they "feel" quicker but with the 
> profiler turned on they are much slower than previously when run with 
> the profiler. So I assume that the profiler is not very "optimized" as yet.
> 
> In these projects, I read and parse about 2800 text files that represent 
> "configurations" which results in about 5400 actual objects over 30 or 
> so classes. The time to load previously was about 6 seconds, most of 
> which was as said above the time taken to execute the "new" methods 
> (actual or implied). Now the load time (without the profiler) appears to 
> be about 2 secs, but with the profiler it is over 15 secs. Whereas 
> running them previously with the profiler turned on was about 8 seconds.
> 
> I admit that these "times" are subjective but hmmmm maybe the profiling 
> code, which is a long lamented (and neglected?) Gambas utility could 
> take a bit of looking at?
> 
> regards
> 
> b
> 

I didn't touch to the profiling code at all. But the gcc compiler can do 
really strange things... Do you recover the speed if you use the stable 
version of Gambas?

-- 
Benoît Minisini.



More information about the User mailing list