[Gambas-user] A lot of warnings from Cppchek with gbc and gbx

[Benoît Minisini]

Le 14/11/2023 à 09:01, Benoît Minisini a écrit :
> Le 14/11/2023 à 08:59, Benoît Minisini a écrit :
>> Le 14/11/2023 à 07:21, Филипп Друан via User a écrit :
>>> Hello all.
>>>
>>> I started the Cppcheck static analyzer by giving it the code gbc and 
>>> gbx (although I'm not sure what they are). The analyzer swore a lot 
>>> and said there were critical errors. I was immediately embarrassed. 
>>> If the code is in the repository, it will most likely be compiled and 
>>> work.
>>> I ask you to run Cppcheck yourself and check what it is not satisfied 
>>> with.
>>> If I succeed, I will try to check your code with a better analyzer.
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Filipp
>>>
>>
>> Beware that 'cppcheck' apparently does not understand many gcc 
>> syntaxes, so you get a lot of false warnings and errors.
>>
>> There are some real warnings or errors to fix anyway, but each 
>> 'cppcheck' output must be carefully check for correctness, so it takes 
>> a lot of time.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
> 
> Moreover, it does not understand many macros used by Gambas code, so it 
> sees only syntax error, undefined variables, and so on.
> 
> Not so useful tool at the moment!
> 

It's better now as I defined a full cppcheck project. I will read the 
documentation before next time. :-)

But it still does not understand the '&&<label>' gcc syntax, which is 
used everywhere in the code. :-/

-- 
Benoît Minisini.