[Gambas-user] Launchpad, Debian maybe?
BB
adamnt42 at gmail.com
Wed Aug 30 12:56:31 CEST 2023
On 30/8/23 8:16 pm, Bruce Steers wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 30 Aug 2023, 09:34 BB, <adamnt42 at gmail.com
> <mailto:adamnt42 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> On 30/8/23 8:07 am, Bruce Steers wrote:
>> I was looking at launchpad and see they support Debian
>> repositories too.
>>
>> Could a Debian launchpad be made / used instead?
>>
>> Wouldn't it also work for Ubuntu and all the systems it currently
>> does with Ubuntu being Debian based ?
>>
>> Respects
>> BruceS
>>
>> ----[http://gambaswiki.org/wiki/doc/netiquette <http://gambaswiki.org/wiki/doc/netiquette> ]----
>
> The difficulties of binary publications are, as I see it, security
> security and security.
>
> The launchpad instance would have to be secure in and of itself. I
> remain to be convinced that this has been achieved yet. The number
> of recent attacks on distro download sites would indicate that
> even widely used download technology is not hardened enough.
>
> The administrators of the launchpad would need to be provably
> totally honest and transparent. In addition there should be either
> a "benevolent dictator" to oversee _any_ change to the binaries
> and the underlying source or a fairly sizeable group of security
> conscious commandos keeping a watch on changes.
>
> Pundits (of the internet type) suggest that the source code for
> the binaries be made unavailable to lessen the chances of
> malicious subterfuge. Which sort of defeats the purpose, I think.
>
> Nah, I'll stay clear for the moment.
>
> b
>
>
> But already Launchpad is used to create Ubuntu packages and these work
> on mint and other Ubuntu derivatives.
>
> I just wondered if the launchpad made Debian binaries instead of
> Ubuntu then would they still work on Ubuntu and mint as well as Debian
> and all other Debian derivatives?
>
> Respects
> BruceS
>
>
> ----[ http://gambaswiki.org/wiki/doc/netiquette ]----
What do you mean by "if the launchpad made Debian binaries"? I didn't
think it actually "made" them, it just published them. Hence my
distrust, which was just a POV.
No matter.
b
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gambas-basic.org/pipermail/user/attachments/20230830/d56878b2/attachment.htm>
More information about the User
mailing list