[Gambas-user] Local changed source files after compile (commit?)
Bruce Steers
bsteers4 at gmail.com
Sat Jan 23 18:07:23 CET 2021
I think its using ./reconf-all --force
Turns out to be a bad move.
Guess I'd better stop doing that then.
On Fri, 22 Jan 2021, 07:07 Benoît Minisini, <g4mba5 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Le 22/01/2021 à 06:28, Bruce Steers a écrit :
> > If i create a branch of gambas and then compile/install it all the local
> > INSTALL files change and it shows on git status as changes to be
> committed?
> >
> > Is it harmless and not worth thinking about to just push the
> > modifications back to the git repository after compilation?
> >
> > Cheers in advance
> > BruceS
> >
> > Here is what 'git status' shows once i have compiled a gambas branch on
> > my computer...
> >
>
> It means that you did something wrong...
>
> --
> Benoît Minisini
>
> ----[ http://gambaswiki.org/wiki/doc/netiquette ]----
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gambas-basic.org/pipermail/user/attachments/20210123/2e72ea5c/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the User
mailing list