[Gambas-user] New packages on the stable PPA

[Jussi Lahtinen]

>
> > Test Timers.Timers
> >   ok 1 - Timers.Timers.17: LRT 1
> >   ok 2 - Timers.Timers.18: LRT 2
> >   ok 3 - Timers.Timers.42: LRT 3
> >   ok 4 - Timers.Timers.43: LRT 4
> > Timers.Timers.56: 0,018020801999683
> >   not ok 5 - Timers.Timers.61: LRT 5
> >   ok 6 - Timers.Timers.62: LRT 6
> >   1..6
> > not ok 9 - Timers.Timers
> >
> > # Ausgeführt: 'Testsuite: Full'
> > #
> > # 1 todo:
> > # 281: GambasSelftests.FastTests.2603 --  # Tests missing
> > #
> > # 1 tests failed:
> > # 5: Timers.Timers.61 -- LRT 5
> > #
> > # FAILED
> > Test without JIT failed
>


This might be OK. The accuracy of timers (especially without RT kernel) is
not strictly determined (or at least AFAIK).
Now, when we expect to get 0.01s (or 10 ms) with tolerance of +-5 ms. It
rarely fails, but sometimes it does.
It seems the accuracy follows somewhat gaussian distribution. Maybe this
test could be improved.


Jussi
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gambas-basic.org/pipermail/user/attachments/20210429/b4013496/attachment-0001.htm>