[Gambas-user] Questions about gb.test and gb.test.tap
Christof Thalhofer
chrisml at deganius.de
Tue Feb 25 18:43:14 CET 2020
Am 25.02.20 um 18:02 schrieb Benoît Minisini:
> Another point: test modules will be available for any project, and
> gb.test may be hidden. At the moment, you have to check the component to
> be able to create test modules.
>
> When the interpreter will be run in test mode, it will load the
> 'gb.test' component automatically.
>
> And I plan to add to the archiver an option that removes the test
> modules from the executable.
>
> So there will be no overhead when running a project with test modules
> normally, and you will be able to create an executable with no test inside.
>
> I'm thinking: is it useful to be able to create executables with test
> modules inside?
I am unsure. Maybe yes ... for gbt3?
And thinking further ... why not? The testing framework is there. It
could be a solution for sth that nobody thought of, for instance
checking a machines state from the distance, like monitoring ... TAP
output could be suitable for this.
I'm a bit tired. Tobi and I talked for about three hours. We are clear
now, we analyzed your suggestions in the first mail of this thread.
I think Tobi will write our conclusions when he has hung his laundry.
;)
Alles Gute
Christof Thalhofer
--
Dies ist keine Signatur
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.gambas-basic.org/pipermail/user/attachments/20200225/b4f56bce/attachment.sig>
More information about the User
mailing list