[Gambas-user] Coming back to gb.test

[Tobias Boege]

On Sun, 05 Apr 2020, Tobias Boege wrote:
> Pros:
>   - Everything in one place. Easier to debug.
> 
> Cons:
>   - Adds dead code to everything that wants to use TAP.
> 
> Neutral:
>   - Ties gb.test to the TAP output format.
> 
> Arguments I don't understand:
>   - Allows gb.test to do accounting in the test process while running.
>     --> What is this good for? And gb.test.tap could expose this, too.
> 
>   - Makes TAP printing testable in the first place.
>     --> gb.test.tap can be tested like everything else. gb.test's self-
>         tests also test compatibility of gb.test.tap with gb.test.
> 

PS: Since we are three people, we can have a decisive majority vote,
that would even decide with an incontestable 2/3 majority :-) I feel
like I made my case sufficiently clear and there is no outcome that
would drive me away from the project.

Since two of three votes appear to be cast, it would boil down to
Benoît making a decision, as was proposed earlier. I don't know if he
wants to do this, though. Just saying I'd be fine with that method.

Regards,
Tobias

-- 
"There's an old saying: Don't change anything... ever!" -- Mr. Monk
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.gambas-basic.org/pipermail/user/attachments/20200405/0f81747c/attachment.sig>