[Gambas-user] a command line with arguments to parsed program?
Bruce
adamnt42 at gmail.com
Wed Oct 16 09:43:05 CEST 2019
Ok, lets get this sorted.
First off, the difference between OPTIONS and ARGUMENTS. I'll use
something we all have as an example. In a virtual terminal type
gbc3 -h
You should get something like:
Compile Gambas projects into architecture-independent bytecode.
Usage: gbc3 [options] [<project directory>]
Options:
-g --debug add debugging information
-v --verbose verbose output
-a --all compile all
-w --warnings display warnings
-t --translate output translation files and compile them
if needed
-p --public-control form controls are public
-m --public-module module symbols are public by default
-s --swap swap endianness
-r --root <directory> gives the gambas installation directory
-e --translate-errors display translatable error messages
-x --exec executable mode (define the 'Exec'
preprocessor constant and remove assertions)
-V --version display version
-L --license display license
-h --help display this help
On the "Usage" line note that the program accepts optionally both
OPTIONS and ARGUMENTS. In fact it uses 1 ARGUMENT the <project
directory>, which is mandatory in almost all cases..
Below that line is a list of the OPTIONS that can be used.
Why is this important? Because the native Args class provided by the
"gb" component considers the whole command line as a space delimited
list of ARGUMENTS (no OPTIONS handling is done and it would be up to the
program code to decipher each token and decide what it is and how to
work with it.
Enter the "gb.args" component.
This component provides much more sophisticated handling of OPTIONS. The
program ARGUMENTS are still returned as a read only array.
There are two types of OPTIONS.
The first I'll call "flags". These are OPTIONS that stand alone. Their
presence in the command line or absence signifies something by itself.
Almost all the gbc3 OPTIONS are flags. In fact all but the -r/--root
options are flags.
The second type I'll call "value" options.
The -r/--root option requires a <directory> value i.e. a string value.
Other value options you may want in your program could be floats or
integers.
So hopefully now we are clear on the difference between OPTIONS and
ARGUMENTS.
But one final note. All the header lines in the above gbc3 -h output
above the
Options:
line are "usage" comments.
So, what does gb.args provide?
It exposes one class, "Args" as explained in the help page that performs
a lot of work for your CLI projects without having to code it yourself.
Firstly the simple one - the -V/--version OPTION is automatically
handled, just by having the gb.args component included.
Secondly the -h/--help OPTION is handled automatically and also you can
provide very sophisticated information about you program by using the
gb.args "algorithm" below.
In your program startup module, i.e. the Main sub, (or a routine called
by Main (to keep things nicely compartmentalised) we need to do the
following:
1) Start the CLI options/arguments handler
2) Test for the presence of each of your program OPTIONS and where
applicable, get their values
3) Tell the handler to stop parsing and return THE REST of the CLI
input as a set of ARGUMENTS in a string array.
so, by way of examplle:
Private Sub ParseCLI()
Args.Begin("This is my brilliant program")
' This is step 1, it "starts the program argument analysis".
But it also takes a string argument that is the "usage" header printed
when the -h option is included by the user on the command line. That is
all you have to do to get your program to display as sophisticated a
"usage" header as you require is to include it as a single string in the
Args.Begin call. For example
Dim sHeader As String = "mygbproject\n===========\n\nMy brilliant
Gambas project\n\nUsage: mygbproject [options] "
Args.Begin(sHeader)
would result in a -h ouput usage header like:
mygbproject
===========
My brilliant Gambas project
Usage: mygbproject <options>
Options: etc....
Now what sort of options do we want? Lets start with a simple "flag"
that if present on the command line will cause you program to print out
lots of debugging information as it runs. Let's say we are going to use
-d/--debug. The way to test whether the user wants the debug output is
to test for this flag using the Args.Has() function. So:
$outputDebug = Args.Has("d","debug","If present the program will output
lots of debugging information to the terminal")
Noting that Args.Has() returns a boolean (that we will set a global
variable so we can use it later where necessary). You also see the
ShortName, LongName and Description parameters populated such that the
-h output will now show :
mygbproject
===========
My brilliant Gambas project
Usage: mygbproject <options>
Options:
-d --debug If present the program will output lots of
debugging information to the terminal
-V --Version Display version
-h --help Display this help
Let's change our mind and provide three different levels of debug
output. This time we use an integer value option as follows:
$debugLevel = Args.GetInteger("d", "debug", "The program will output
lotsheaps or tins of debugging information to the terminal", "level", 1)
With this, if the user species the -d/--debug <int> pair on the command
line the $debugLevel value will be set to that value. (if they only
provide the option without a value then it will be set to 1 - automagically!
The -h output will now look like:
mygbproject
===========
My brilliant Gambas project
Usage: mygbproject <options>
Options:
-d --debug <level> The program will output lots or heaps or tons
of debugging information to the terminal (default=1)
-V --Version Display version
-h --help Display this help
Hmm, we can do better than that! Is 1 equal to "lots" or "tons"?
Lets try a string value option:
$debugLevelStr = Args.Get("d", "debug", "The program will output lots
(L) or heaps (H) or tons (T) of debugging information to the terminal",
"level")
If present then the $debugLevelStr value will be set to the value
provided (NOTE! the gb.args Args.Get() function does NOT provide a
default value!). And the -h output will look like:
mygbproject
===========
My brilliant Gambas project
Usage: mygbproject <options>
Options:
-d --debug <level> The program will output lots (L) or heaps (H)
or tons (T) of debugging information to the terminal
-V --Version Display version
-h --help Display this help
Args.GetFloat() acts similarly to Args,GetInteger.
Now there is only one thing left, the Args.End() call. This handles the
program ARGUMENTS exactly as specified in the help page, So,
$myArgs = Args.End()
It would be usual to indicate the ARGUMENTS in the usage header
indicating whether they are optional and whether multiple values are
handled. Say we need one or more file names as ARGUMENTS. Then something
like
mygbproject
===========
My brilliant Gambas project
Usage: mygbproject <options> [filename]...
Options:
-d --debug <level> The program will output lots (L) or heaps (H)
or tons
(T) of debugging information to the terminal
- -- <<new>>
-V --Version Display version
-h --help Display this help
would be appropriate.
I think that's about the simplest I can put it. When you consider the
amount of code you would have to write to handle the above using the
simple gb Args class, it's quite amazing actually.
hth
bruce
More information about the User
mailing list