[Gambas-user] [Gambas Bug Tracker] Bug #1100: ODBC driver super buggy 1: rs.count return always negative and only one event in lasted

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

2017-05-03 22:04 GMT-04:00 <d4t4full at ...626...>:

> Also, in case you didn't know, Microsoft was one of the leading forces
> behind drafting

yeah.. i use sybase the original software behind the SQL server and the
only way to connect to its odbc (inclusivelly internally always used odbc
bridgeds, so then m$ its reasonable to are behind that papers)


> But anyway both MS and IBM  (at least when I read the docs to make the
> Gambas component work again) were kind enough to mark clearly any
> deviations or differences from the standard in their ODBC docs.
>
u are the mantainer and author of the ODBC componet? i used extensivelly
the ODBC component and i was thinking that i'm the only used deeply..
tomorrow i'll test again a SP that will retrieve a thousands  of rows...
(currently i make it with a dummy table, production will retrieve thousands)

Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

2017-05-03 22:09 GMT-04:00 <d4t4full at ...626...>:

> Hehe... you're right. But I also cited IBM's ODBC docs for its DB2, and
> you can also check Easysoft's excellent C tutorials at
> http://www.easysoft.com/developer/languages/c/odbc_tutorial.html.
> Speaking about Easysoft, I myself made a command line ODBC tool to connect
> with ConnectionStrings and run queries in C with Easysoft's tutorials...
> And I absolutely suck at C. That good are those tutorials!
>
> Also, in case you didn't know, Microsoft was one of the leading forces
> behind drafting ODBC, as this quote from Wikipedia says:
>
> ODBC was originally developed by Microsoft and Progress DataDirect during
> the early 1990s, and became the basis for the Call Level Interface (CLI)
> standardized by SQL Access Group in the Unix and mainframe field.
>
> So by using their docs you know that that is the standard. Well, at least
> theirs... They suck at Windows (and OS making and privacy respecting in
> general), yes, but they sometimes pull nice tricks off their hats like
> ODBC. And that is not the only standard they helped draft.
>
> But anyway both MS and IBM  (at least when I read the docs to make the
> Gambas component work again) were kind enough to mark clearly any
> deviations or differences from the standard in their ODBC docs.
>
> Hope that helps,
> zxMarce.
>
> On May 3, 2017, 21:20, at 21:20, bugtracker at ...3416... wrote:
> >http://gambaswiki.org/bugtracker/edit?object=BUG.1100&from=L21haW4-
> >
> >Comment #8 by PICCORO LENZ MCKAY:
> >
> >i noyed u only cited mocosoft papers.. dont know about mocosoft like
> >papers.. mocosoft tendts to change everything depends of their
> >convenience...
> >
> >
> >odbc its today standardized by SQL Access Group in the Unix and
> >mainframe field so please cited a right paper.. not windo/like
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Gambas-user mailing list
> Gambas-user at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
>