[Gambas-user] static ? in variables

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

tobias..now making a library  in the ide, the class that not have the
"create static" now not permits instanciate the class

i only put a variable static, rest of class not have create static

Export

Private dblocal As String = "file1.txt"
Static Public status As Integer = 0

now the class "dbcontext" said cannot be instanciate, i do not have
the CREATE PRIVATE declaration inside it!




Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

2017-06-15 16:07 GMT-04:00 PICCORO McKAY Lenz <mckaygerhard at ...626...>:

> ok tobias, i reading and property translated to spanish.. thanks for your
> help.. (umm i thnik was too compresed the info.. but in any case ...)
>
> http://gambaswiki.org/wiki/lang/createstatic?l=es
>
> please for spanish use revised and compelte if need..
>
> Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
> http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com
>
> 2017-06-15 15:15 GMT-04:00 PICCORO McKAY Lenz <mckaygerhard at ...626...>:
>
>> hi tobias, please , change you the now modified wiki page.. i changed
>> maybe before u read it!
>>
>> and also change the spanish too, http://gambaswiki.org/wik
>> i/lang/createstatic?l=es
>>
>> please change you or revised the actual and made right corrections.. i
>> think u visit the wiki after i made the changes.. i must added parto of
>> your explanation due the wiki has confuse info..
>>
>> i will monitoring the wiki after you made some changes to also update the
>> spanish part
>>
>> Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
>> http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com
>>
>> 2017-06-15 15:02 GMT-04:00 Tobias Boege <taboege at ...626...>:
>>
>>> On Thu, 15 Jun 2017, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote:
>>> > hi tobias, *the documentation are totally wrong.. due the documentation
>>> > makes a explicit citation to the concep in wikipedia*,that's why i ask
>>> so
>>> > many about it
>>> >
>>> > now i propose to change by myselft that documentation to a proper
>>> paragraph
>>> > that translators can understand without transliterate the meaning..
>>> >
>>> > and in any case thanks to your explication now i can understand the
>>> right
>>> > usage..
>>> >
>>> > with this specific problem i can point the importance of a
>>> documentation,
>>> > i'll practice some all of your said and then try to correct better the
>>> wiki
>>> > doc
>>> >
>>>
>>> Well, I read the wiki page again after you pointed this out and,
>>> technically
>>> speaking, the wiki is correct:
>>>
>>>   This feature allows you to implement the object-oriented programming
>>> singleton pattern.
>>>
>>> Indeed CREATE STATIC allows you to implement the familiar singleton
>>> pattern,
>>> but CREATE STATIC *alone* does not suffice. To get the singleton you
>>> have to
>>> use
>>>
>>>   CREATE STATIC
>>>   CREATE PRIVATE
>>>
>>> together (CREATE PRIVATE is linked on the CREATE STATIC page and it
>>> disallows the creation of objects of a class, except for the automatic
>>> instance, because the interpreter can and will bypass the CREATE PRIVATE
>>> limit to fulfill the CREATE STATIC flag).
>>>
>>> Maybe this is all that's needed for the clarification. If you agree that
>>> CREATE STATIC + CREATE PRIVATE = singleton pattern, then I can change
>>> the wiki page, with slightly better English I believe.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Tobi
>>>
>>> --
>>> "There's an old saying: Don't change anything... ever!" -- Mr. Monk
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ------------------
>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gambas-user mailing list
>>> Gambas-user at lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
>>>
>>
>>
>