[Gambas-user] Share code across projects

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

i thinks that all those great "ideas" have too many depends on network!

some time ago some devels cited the problem of the online-always
documentation and

the gambas team work hard to make the help available offline,

now this "ideas" are some regression of that important behavior!!!

what are happened here???

Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

2016-01-24 12:19 GMT-04:30 Benoît Minisini <gambas at ...1...>:

> Le 24/01/2016 17:17, Tobias Boege a écrit :
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > with the semester break upcoming, I plan to supplement a project of mine
> > with some other applications in which I want to use classes from the
> > project. I have not, if memory serves, written any "local" components
> yet.
> > By "local" I mean a component which is *not* installed into
> /usr/lib/gambas3.
> >
> >>From what I remember from other threads, I could:
> >    - symlink source files around,
> >    - copy source files around,
> >    - install the project to /usr/lib/gambas3, or
> >    - create a Library.
> >
> > I don't really want to copy source files as I presume they will change
> > considerably during development. The symlink solution is kind of dirty
> and
> > makes the projects less easy to give to others. I would prefer not to
> touch
> > /usr/lib/gambas3 for some private project of very limited scope (i.e. it
> is
> > way too specific to lie amongst the general components). As I imagine,
> using
> > a library becomes messy, too, if it should be shared by multiple
> projects.
> > Also I couldn't really share my project because the library path is
> absolute
> > and won't work on somebody else's computer (right?).
> >
> > How are you others doing this? Did you notice or can you imagine any
> problems
> > with your way of doing it? Any arguments in favour of the library
> approach?
> >
> > I think a user-specific directory for custom components would be nice. It
> > would be a standard path relative to a user's home directory which is
> > taken into account by the IDE (when it lists the installed components)
> and
> > the interpreter (when it loads components). Or is that considered a
> security
> > risk, Benoit?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tobi
> >
>
> User-specific directory for components was existing before but has been
> removed.
>
> I think that custom components (in the sense of Gambas) can be a
> security risk, but it is above all a management mess.
>
> Moreover, as I said elsewhere, for me components are part of the
> language, it's like "interpreter drivers".
>
> So I'd prefer using libraries for that.
>
> But to fit your needs, I have to enhance the libraries support with:
>
> - The ability to share libraries between different projects without
> having to put everything in the same directory.
>
> - The ability to explicitly load a library from any path.
>
> What do you think?
>
> --
> Benoît Minisini
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> Gambas-user mailing list
> Gambas-user at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
>