[Gambas-user] gambas on gentoo

[Tobias Boege]

On Wed, 05 Feb 2014, Dominique Michel wrote:
> Le Wed, 5 Feb 2014 20:50:10 +0100,
> Tobias Boege <taboege at ...626...> a ?crit :
> 
> > On Wed, 05 Feb 2014, Dominique Michel wrote:
> > > Le Tue, 4 Feb 2014 09:13:08 +0100,
> > > Dominique Michel <dominique.michel at ...3298...> a ?crit :
> > > 
> > > > Hi all,
> > > > 
> > > > First, thank you for gambas. Even if a Linux system is more
> > > > complicated, it remain me my old time with an Amiga in the
> > > > eighties. Simple, powerful and efficient.
> > > > 
> > > > gambas is not in portage currently, and it is an old bug report
> > > > with an ebuild at https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302136
> > > > 
> > > > I just updated the ebuild to gambas-3.5.2. When installing it, I
> > > > get the following warnings from portage:
> > > 
> > > More important, another user get the following error:
> > > 
> > > I got a lot of "symbol lookup
> > > error: /var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/gambas-3.5.2/image//usr/lib64/gambas3/gb.image.so:
> > > undefined symbol: pow" Therefor gambas it's unusable for me.
> > > 
> > > ||
> > > || Unable to compile gb.desktop
> > > || Unable to compile gb.eval.highlight
> > > || Unable to compile gb.gui.base
> > > || Unable to compile gb.form
> > > || Unable to compile gb.form.dialog
> > > || Unable to compile gb.form.mdi
> > > || Unable to compile gb.db.form
> > > || Unable to compile gb.report
> > > || Unable to compile gb.chart
> > > || Unable to compile gb.net.pop3
> > > || Unable to compile gb.memcached
> > > || Unable to compile gb.map
> > > || Unable to compile gambas3
> > > ||
> > > 
> > > I added -lm to ldflags in makefile but with no use. 
> > > 
> > > #endquote
> > > 
> > > Do you know which dependency is missing, and if not, what more is
> > > needed to know it?
> > > 
> > 
> > Hmm, I can't remember any of the Gambas developers using Gentoo. Maybe
> > that's why you didn't get an answer yet (I can't imagine at all what's
> > the matter with pow).
> > 
> > Maybe I'll find some place on my harddisk for a Gentoo chroot...
> 
> I don't get this issue on my system. If you take a look at the bug
> report, you will see that user have unsafe cflags in make.conf (by
> unsafe I mean cflags that need to be tested on a per package basis,
> and are not 100% safe to use as system wide cflags):
> 
>  CFLAGS="-O2 -pipe -march=native -ffast-math -w -flto=8
> -fno-fat-lto-objects"
> 

Do you want to tell me that this is a actually non-issue?

Regards,
Tobi

-- 
"There's an old saying: Don't change anything... ever!" -- Mr. Monk