[Gambas-user] MOD arithetic operator
user
demosthenesk at ...626...
Tue Nov 9 13:05:56 CET 2010
> In my opinion that is correct choice.
>
>Because if you remove DIV aka / operator there will be problem for
those
Because if you remove DIV aka \ operator there will be problem for those
(sorry mistake!)
> who used this in their programs in the past.
>
> In the other hand if you add % operator as MOD the arithmetic
operators
> will be complete and whole in my opinion as i read the manual.
>
> A last note if old developers like very much the strict classic Basic
> style you must weight their opinion if it is going to add or not a MOD
> operator, so not to be hard feelings.
>
>
> On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 12:31 +0100, Benoît Minisini wrote:
> > > Hi to all, and good morning.
> > >
> > > Dont worry you dont hurt me. :)
> > >
> > > I am not a C++ person not at all.
> > >
> > > Of course there is no need to turn Basic in C style.
> > >
> > > But i make a notice about DIV and MOD.
> > > The one of them has a synonmous as operator.
> > >
> > > The only thing i propose is to maintain a same "thinking" while
reading
> > > the manual with programming style.
> > >
> > > To do this there are two options
> > > - MOD and DIV should not have operators
> > > - MOD and DIV it is nice to have operators.
> > >
> > > Or we leave the things as they are.
> > >
> > > All options are respectfull ones.
> > >
> >
> > I can add '%' to the compiler as a MOD synonymous, as I don't think
I will use
> > this character for anything else.
> >
>
More information about the User
mailing list