[Gambas-user] A minor bug with TabStrip Control - GTK

[Benoît Minisini]

> > Greetings all,
> > 
> > I think I have found a minor bug with the TabStrip control where the
> > Tabs remain 'invisible'  when you toggle the visibility mode while it is
> > in the foreground of another control.
> > I could not find this bug listed anywhere - it may have already been
> > fixed in V3.
> > 
> > Gambas version used in testing 2.20.
> > Issues only occurs with gb.gtk - gb.qt seems to be fine.
> > 
> > [To Test set project properties to gb.gtk]
> > 
> > I created a standard form with a:
> > Gridview control
> > TabStrip control
> > Label control in the body of Tab[0]  (to test visibility of controls in
> > TabStrip body).
> > Button
> > 
> > I set the arrangement of the TabStrip control to - 'Bring To Foreground'
> > in the GUI.
> > 
> > The area of the Tabs in the TabStrip control must be over the background
> > control.
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -- ----------- [Code used to display bug.]
> > 
> > PUBLIC SUB Form_Open()
> > TabStrip1.Visible = FALSE
> > END
> > 
> > PUBLIC SUB Button1_Click()
> > 
> >   TabStrip1.Visible = TRUE
> > 
> > END
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > When you click on Button1 the body of the TabStrip becomes visible - the
> > label control in Tab[0] is visible.
> > The tabs ( any number ) remain invisible provided they are over the
> > background control.
> > 
> > Note # If you add the line Gridview1.visible = FALSE to the Button1
> > Click event , the tabs of the TabStrip control are then visible at run
> > time.
> > 
> > I found that every control I tested as the background control ( Panel,
> > Text box, Frame...) produced the same results as long as the Tabs were
> > over the background control.
> > 
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Ian Roper
> > Perth - Western Australia
> 
> Please provide a little project, it will be far easier and safer for me to
> fix the bug!
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> Regards,

OK. I could reproduce the bug anyway. Very strange indeed...

-- 
Benoît Minisini