[Gambas-user] Licensing problems in Gambas
Charlie Reinl
Karl.Reinl at ...9...
Thu Nov 19 16:36:12 CET 2009
Am Donnerstag, den 19.11.2009, 10:06 -0500 schrieb Rob:
> On Thursday 19 November 2009 07:09 am, Benoît Minisini wrote:
> > There are two licensing problems in Gambas that must be solved.
> > 1) The first one should not be difficult: we must find a license for the
> > gambas wiki documentation that makes it free. I need suggestions...
>
> Wikipedia uses the GNU FDL, and of course there are the various Creative
> Commons licenses that are better suited to documentation than programs.
>
> I guess the next question is whether everyone who's contributed to the wiki
> will go for whichever license you pick; I'm certainly okay with the GFDL or
> CC-BY-SA, but I have no idea how other people would feel.
>
> I thought I had some text in the old Wiki on the editor page that required
> the user to submit their entries under some free license, but that page
> wasn't included in the static dumps for obvious reasons and I can't find
> the old tarballs of our TWiki installation that I made after the spammers
> attacked. At any rate, I don't see anything like that in the current
> Wiki's editor.
>
> > 2) The bad problem: gb.db.firebird uses two sources files from
> > www.ibpp.org whose license (the Borland Interbase Public License) is
> > not compatible with the GPL. This point was raised by Kelly Hopkins,
> > the maintainer of the gnu.org free software directory. I'm afraid
> > Gambas will have to lose firebird support, but maybe we should ask
> > www.ibpp.org about that. I need help there too!
>
> Who wrote gb.db.firebird? Maybe they could maintain it as a separate
> package, though I guess whichever Gambas headers they built against would
> have to be relicensed as LGPL in that case. I didn't know anyone used
> firebird anymore.
>
> Rob
Salut Rob,
gambas-1.0.17/help/VisualIntroductionToGambas.html
is this what your looking for ?
--
Amicalment
Charlie
More information about the User
mailing list