[Gambas-user] Revision: 2514
Benoît Minisini
gambas at ...1...
Sat Dec 26 19:17:41 CET 2009
> Le jeudi 24 décembre 2009 17:33:56, Benoît Minisini a écrit :
> > > > Le jeudi 24 décembre 2009 16:27:14, Charlie Reinl a écrit :
> > > > > gambas3 Revision: 2514
> > > > > does not compile for me , fails at reconf
> > > > >
> > > > > Charlie
> > > >
> > > > I guess it's because the m4/ltversion.m4 is missing.... There is
> > > > really a big differences between libtool 1.5.x and 2.x ! Does the
> > > > file is present ?
> > > >
> > > > With libtool 2.x (and install option) ltversion.m4 is automaticaly
> > > > installed, files config.guess, ltmain.sh, config.sub, install-sh
> > > > are not needed (i've remove them and it's building fine (they are
> > > > created during make install). Users (benoit and others) should try to
> > > > remove them and see if they are correctly created (and it's
> > > > installing fine)
> > > >
> > > > Here it's libtool version 2.2.6b (libtool --version);
> > > >
> > > > We can keep compatibility with with 1.5.x libtool, but we will have
> > > > lot of headache with libtool 2.x,
> > > >
> > > > ++
> > >
> > > config.guess, ltmain.sh, config.sub and install.sh in source
> > > sub-directories are all symbolic links to the one located in the
> > > source root directory.
> > >
> > > I will remove them, and you will tell me what happens! :-)
> >
> > I said rubbish. All these files are not versioned at all, so they are
> > always recreated when you do a reconf after a checkout.
> >
> > So I don't see how Gambas could be compilable with both libtool 1.5 and
> > libtool 2.x...
>
> And they are in the repository see:
> http://gambas.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/gambas/gambas/trunk/gb.opengl/
>
> So they can be removed
>
Not really. Those who are in the repository are actually symbolic links to the
same files located in the root directory that are *not* in the repository.
Having symbolic links makes the tar.gz source package generated by autoconf
tools lighter. I can remove them, they will be regenerated again, but not as
symbolic links, and the tar.gz source becomes heavier.
But anyway that won't solve the problem: having a source package that can be
compiled both with libtool 1.5 and libtool 2.x.
--
Benoît Minisini
More information about the User
mailing list