[Gambas-user] Maybe a weird question
Heinz Sporn
heinz.sporn at ...1017...
Tue Jun 28 12:23:35 CEST 2005
Hi!
Sorry Maurizio, but I believe you immersed a little too much into
Windoze-like software deployment. There's a reason why no Python, Perl
or let's say PHP application is distributed in a bundle with the
regarding interpreter. There's simply too much flavours of Linux out
there.
And here comes the beauty with all the reusable libraries, application
frameworks and interpreters: your application does not have to bother
wether or not this or that library is installed at all or carries a
specific version number. The only thing you have to say is: I don't care
what type of Linux you're using or what libraries are installed - just
get Gambas running on your fancy machine and you're fine.
Anyway pre-compiled packages would set too much limits. An example: I'm
a happy Gentoo user. Why should I bother with rpms and debs? I would
need the Gambas sources anyway to compile them against may running
environment. A pre-compiled package would propably not even execute on
my machines and if it would run like a lame duck ;-)
Regards
spox
Am Dienstag, den 28.06.2005, 09:36 +0100 schrieb Maurizio Pozzobon:
> 2005/6/28, Daniel Campos <danielcampos at ...282...>:
> The fake problem of the interpreter availability
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Often, some people says: Hey, Gambas programs should be
> compiled, if not,
> we need the interpreter installed in the machine! We can not
> distribute it!
>
> Let me tell you just one thing:
>
> 1) can you run any KDE program without all its dependencies
> installed?
> 2) Can you do it with a Gnome program?
> 3) May be just a QT or GTK program?
> 6) Any graphical program without all X libraries?
> 4) Can you use Mplayer without a lot of libraries for codecs?
> 5) Can you install a Apache to serve CGI applications without
> Perl or
> Python (or Gambas)?
> 6) Can you run any perl, python or bash program without their
> interpreters?
>
> Where's then the problem?
>
> The problem is that to all yours questions the answer is "No". As you
> can see in my previous mail I'd like to be able to create an
> All-in-One package (rpm or deb) easy to install so that the user could
> be able to choose between the normal pack for those who alredy have
> the dep installed, or like to install them form source, and the big
> one for those who like the easy way.
> I think that no one would care if it is interpretable if it is easy to
> distribute and ofcourse to use
>
> --
> Maurizio
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Heinz Sporn
SPORN it-freelancing
Mobile: ++43 (0)699 / 127 827 07
Email: heinz.sporn at ...1017...
heinz.sporn at ...1018...
Snail: Steyrer Str. 20
A-4540 Bad Hall
Austria / Europe
More information about the User
mailing list