[Gambas-user] makefile.am problematic?

SainTiss saintiss at ...477...
Sat Jun 12 18:59:10 CEST 2004


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

I was trying to package gambas, which worked more or less with a few tricks 
here and there, but when it finally succeeded, the resulting rpm moaned that 
"lib.gb.so.0" was needed, but couldn't be found...

The reason is simple, as in the gambas Makefile.am, it says:
    @rm -f $(DESTDIR)$(pkglibdir)/lib.gb.la
    @rm -f $(DESTDIR)$(pkglibdir)/lib.gb.so*

so those files are explicitly removed... Why is this? Is this necessary 
somehow? Or is this just to confuse packagers? ;)

Thanks,

Hans

- -- 
Ark Linux - Linux for the Masses (http://arklinux.org)

If we cannot live so as to be happy, let us at least live so as to deserve it
 -- Immanuel Hermann Fichte

Capitalism: 
You don't have any cows. The bank will not lend you money to buy cows, 
because you don't have any cows to put up as collateral.

Representative Democracy:
You have two cows. Your neighbors pick someone to tell you who gets the milk. 

In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?

Hans Schippers
2LIC INF
UA 2003-2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAyzZeXlnUYIbmLOQRAotiAKCTSP/K142TW5x+gjI3y0mrPSC+ugCgpyfd
vmbzbe46fHcl3PkZ7Oen/kY=
=AA54
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the User mailing list