[Gambas-user] CryptoExample & gCrypto

[Brant Wells]

Hey Daniel:

It's been more everybody else's efforts... I'm just putting it all 
together. ;-) ...  It might be an inconsistency in the version of 
blowfish that I use, and the one that Leo ported from...  I may take 
another whack at Blowfish, since I have discovered how to do 2d arrays 
in Gambas now [looking @ Leo's examples...]...  Just one strange thing 
leads to another, this day in age!

Daniel Oxley wrote:

>Sounds great.  I am sure a lot of people appreciate the effort you are
>making!
>
>I would have thought though, that any string encoded using Blowfish could be
>decrypted on any platform supporting blowfish?  Much in the same way that I
>can encrypt a message on Windows using PGP and GPG on Suse can decrypt it.
>
>So, dare I say it, if they are not compatible (your version and Leo's) there
>may be a bug somewhere.  The bigger problem might be tracing it!
>
>Daniel
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: gambas-user-admin at lists.sourceforge.net
>[mailto:gambas-user-admin at lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Brant Wells
>Sent: 27 July 2004 18:09
>To: gambas-user at lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: Re: [Gambas-user] CryptoExample & gCrypto
>
>Hey Daniel:
>
>Leo had the code written in for that in his implementation of blowfish.  
>I haven't implemented it in gCrypto yet, due lack of time.  That will be 
>coming in the next release.  It should work on purdy much any machine 
>that has Gambas on it...  so If you're stuck using another version of 
>linux, feel free to try it out and let me know... ;-)
>
>Also, I have done some testing...  I am not sure whose implementation of 
>blowfish that Leo ported from [I found several versions for VB]...  But 
>the VB code that I have, and the Gambas code that Leo wrote DO NOT 
>operate together...  From the looks of it, they are two totally separate 
>monsters.
>
>How can you test if it is the blowfish encryption??  I have no clue....  
>Ha ha ha.  I have the encryptions separated into their own classes, so 
>they do not interfere with one another, if that is what you mean.  Check 
>out the CryptoExample... It reveals all... well... almost all.
>
>Let me know when you have time to check it!
>
>Thanks!
>~Brant
>  
>