Le 07/08/2012 00:06, Emil Lenngren a écrit : > Ok. Have never seen it before... It is quite risky. > > #define OBJECT_are_not_null(_o1, _o2) (((intptr_t)(_o1) & > (intptr_t)(_o2)) != 0) > > The same there, the objects 0x0f0f0f00 and 0xf0f0f0f0 are not non-null > according to that define... > > /Emil > Yep. Same mistake... -- Benoît Minisini