From jredrejo at ...82... Tue Mar 8 12:20:37 2011 From: jredrejo at ...82... (=?UTF-8?Q?Jos=C3=A9_Luis_Redrejo_Rodr=C3=ADguez?=) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 12:20:37 +0100 Subject: [Gambas-devel] Removal of gambas2 from Debian Message-ID: Hi, Debian has among its targets for the next release removing kde3 and qt3 from its archive. As far as I know, gambas2 can not be compiled against qt4 and kde4. If that's not the case and it can be done, please tell it to me, otherwise I'll ask for the removal of gambas2 from the Debian archive within a week. Regards. Jos? L. From gambas at ...1... Tue Mar 8 18:19:54 2011 From: gambas at ...1... (=?utf-8?q?Beno=C3=AEt_Minisini?=) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 18:19:54 +0100 Subject: [Gambas-devel] Removal of gambas2 from Debian In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201103081819.54241.gambas@...1...> > Hi, > Debian has among its targets for the next release removing kde3 and > qt3 from its archive. > As far as I know, gambas2 can not be compiled against qt4 and kde4. > > If that's not the case and it can be done, please tell it to me, > otherwise I'll ask for the removal of gambas2 from the Debian archive > within a week. > > Regards. > Jos? L. > OK. Gambas 2 will never compile agains qt4, so you should ask for its removal. But: Qt3 is graphically faster than Qt4 most of the time. Qt3 uses less memory. Qt3 is usable through the network (X11 and NX), whereas Qt4 is far too slow, because it caches everything. So if find that decision absolutely and deeply stupid. If you can tell Debian guys... ;-) Regards, -- Beno?t Minisini From jredrejo at ...82... Tue Mar 8 20:16:51 2011 From: jredrejo at ...82... (=?UTF-8?Q?Jos=C3=A9_Luis_Redrejo_Rodr=C3=ADguez?=) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 20:16:51 +0100 Subject: [Gambas-devel] Removal of gambas2 from Debian In-Reply-To: <201103081819.54241.gambas@...1...> References: <201103081819.54241.gambas@...1...> Message-ID: 2011/3/8 Beno?t Minisini : >> Hi, >> Debian has among its targets for the next release removing kde3 and >> qt3 from its archive. >> As far as I know, gambas2 can not be compiled against ?qt4 and kde4. >> >> If that's not the case and it can be done, please tell it to me, >> otherwise I'll ask for the removal of gambas2 from the Debian archive >> within a week. >> >> Regards. >> Jos? L. >> > > OK. Gambas 2 will never compile agains qt4, so you should ask for its removal. > > But: > > Qt3 is graphically faster than Qt4 most of the time. > > Qt3 uses less memory. > > Qt3 is usable through the network (X11 and NX), whereas Qt4 is far too slow, > because it caches everything. > > So if find that decision absolutely and deeply stupid. If you can tell Debian > guys... ;-) > No problem, I'll forward your email to the bug. Anyway, as far as I remember the problem is not in Debian but in Trolltech-Nokia-Whatever_name_it_has_now : they have said they're not going to provide any kind of support (even security support) to qt3, so a distribution can not guarantee its safe shape. Regards. Jos? L. > Regards, > > -- > Beno?t Minisini > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > What You Don't Know About Data Connectivity CAN Hurt You > This paper provides an overview of data connectivity, details > its effect on application quality, and explores various alternative > solutions. http://p.sf.net/sfu/progress-d2d > _______________________________________________ > Gambas-devel mailing list > Gambas-devel at lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-devel > From sbungay at ...642... Wed Mar 9 22:13:20 2011 From: sbungay at ...642... (Stephen Bungay) Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 16:13:20 -0500 Subject: [Gambas-devel] Removal of gambas2 from Debian In-Reply-To: References: <201103081819.54241.gambas@...1...> Message-ID: <4D77ED70.9060804@...642...> On 03/08/2011 02:16 PM, Jos? Luis Redrejo Rodr?guez wrote: > 2011/3/8 Beno?t Minisini: >>> Hi, >>> Debian has among its targets for the next release removing kde3 and >>> qt3 from its archive. >>> As far as I know, gambas2 can not be compiled against qt4 and kde4. >>> >>> If that's not the case and it can be done, please tell it to me, >>> otherwise I'll ask for the removal of gambas2 from the Debian archive >>> within a week. >>> >>> Regards. >>> Jos? L. >>> >> OK. Gambas 2 will never compile agains qt4, so you should ask for its removal. >> >> But: >> >> Qt3 is graphically faster than Qt4 most of the time. >> >> Qt3 uses less memory. >> >> Qt3 is usable through the network (X11 and NX), whereas Qt4 is far too slow, >> because it caches everything. >> >> So if find that decision absolutely and deeply stupid. If you can tell Debian >> guys... ;-) >> > > No problem, I'll forward your email to the bug. Anyway, as far as I > remember the problem is not in Debian but in > Trolltech-Nokia-Whatever_name_it_has_now : they have said they're not > going to provide any kind of support (even security support) to qt3, > so a distribution can not guarantee its safe shape. > > Regards. > Jos? L. > > >> Regards, >> >> -- >> Beno?t Minisini >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> What You Don't Know About Data Connectivity CAN Hurt You >> This paper provides an overview of data connectivity, details >> its effect on application quality, and explores various alternative >> solutions. http://p.sf.net/sfu/progress-d2d >> _______________________________________________ >> Gambas-devel mailing list >> Gambas-devel at lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-devel >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > What You Don't Know About Data Connectivity CAN Hurt You > This paper provides an overview of data connectivity, details > its effect on application quality, and explores various alternative > solutions. http://p.sf.net/sfu/progress-d2d > _______________________________________________ > Gambas-devel mailing list > Gambas-devel at lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-devel Agree with Benoit. From kevinfishburne at ...590... Sat Mar 12 03:16:54 2011 From: kevinfishburne at ...590... (Kevin Fishburne) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:16:54 -0500 Subject: [Gambas-devel] gb3: compiling creates desktop launcher Message-ID: <4D7AD796.7040207@...590...> I think this functionality should be optional via project properties or disabled entirely. It overwrites my existing launcher, which is extremely irritating. Also anyone programming a GAMBAS project should be familiar enough with their own operating system to manually create their own launcher if they desire one, so theoretically the functionality is unnecessary anyway. -- Kevin Fishburne Eight Virtues www: http://sales.eightvirtues.com e-mail: sales at ...590... phone: (770) 853-6271 From gambas at ...1... Sat Mar 12 14:34:28 2011 From: gambas at ...1... (=?utf-8?q?Beno=C3=AEt_Minisini?=) Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 14:34:28 +0100 Subject: [Gambas-devel] gb3: compiling creates desktop launcher In-Reply-To: <4D7AD796.7040207@...590...> References: <4D7AD796.7040207@...590...> Message-ID: <201103121434.28422.gambas@...1...> > I think this functionality should be optional via project properties or > disabled entirely. It overwrites my existing launcher, which is > extremely irritating. Also anyone programming a GAMBAS project should be > familiar enough with their own operating system to manually create their > own launcher if they desire one, so theoretically the functionality is > unnecessary anyway. This is optional: you have a check box for that in the executable creation dialog. Regards, -- Beno?t Minisini From kevinfishburne at ...590... Sat Mar 12 20:07:52 2011 From: kevinfishburne at ...590... (Kevin Fishburne) Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 14:07:52 -0500 Subject: [Gambas-devel] gb3: compiling creates desktop launcher In-Reply-To: <201103121434.28422.gambas@...1...> References: <4D7AD796.7040207@...590...> <201103121434.28422.gambas@...1...> Message-ID: <4D7BC488.7060909@...590...> On 03/12/2011 08:34 AM, Beno?t Minisini wrote: >> I think this functionality should be optional via project properties or >> disabled entirely. It overwrites my existing launcher, which is >> extremely irritating. Also anyone programming a GAMBAS project should be >> familiar enough with their own operating system to manually create their >> own launcher if they desire one, so theoretically the functionality is >> unnecessary anyway. > This is optional: you have a check box for that in the executable creation > dialog. Sorry... I'm blind sometimes it seems. I found it. -- Kevin Fishburne Eight Virtues www: http://sales.eightvirtues.com e-mail: sales at ...590... phone: (770) 853-6271