[Gambas-devel] Well, I think it's a good change...

nospam.nospam.nospam at ...176... nospam.nospam.nospam at ...176...
Tue Dec 1 08:53:04 CET 2009


Benoît Minisini wrote:

> And, more important, you should better develop on Gambas 3 than
> Gambas 2. I mean, I won't merge a change in Gambas 2 if I don't have
> the equivalent for Gambas 3.

About that. Would you accept a change for G3 without it being done for G2 
also?





More information about the Devel mailing list