[Gambas-devel] Perfomance differences between gb.gtk and gb.qt components

José Luis Redrejo jredrejo at ...176...
Fri Dec 7 16:26:59 CET 2007


Tested on a not-very-good computer with only 512 Mb of RAM and now it
behaves perfectly, same starting time for the application using gtk or qt.

Thanks very much.

Off Topic: I have problems trying to do the configure in the gb.sdl &
gb.sdl.sound components. There were error messages because the AM_PATH_SDL(
1.2.8, [] , [touch DISABLED]) part.

Regards.

2007/12/4, Benoit Minisini <gambas at ...1...>:
>
> On lundi 3 décembre 2007, José Luis Redrejo wrote:
> > I attach here a simple example: its a form with a lot of widgets, but
> only
> > this code:
> > PUBLIC SUB Form_Open()
> >     PRINT "before"
> >       WAIT 1
> >       PRINT "after"
> >
> > END
> >
> > You can see as it takes ages between printing "before" and "after" in
> the
> > console.
> > The funniest thing: if you add a timer to the form, it behaves right.
> > This didn't happen before the loop event fixes for gtk.
> >
> > On the other hand, it's a little ridiculous the thread about the gtk
> > slowness vs qt speed. Whenever I start qt applications from a Gnome
> desktop
> > qt (and specially kde) apps need a long time to start. If you're a kde
> user
> > you'll notice the same with gtk applications. It's not a question of
> which
> > platform is fastest, it's a question of merging them.
> > I'm not going to be the advocate of gtk (some of its libraries suck) but
> > some of the things I've read in the last days are a nonsense.
> >
> > Cheers.
> > José L.
> >
>
> I have fixed some little things in the gb.gtk component: please tell me if
> the
> behaviour is better now.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Benoit Minisini
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
> from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
> mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
> http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
> _______________________________________________
> Gambas-devel mailing list
> Gambas-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gambas-basic.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20071207/5cbdb092/attachment.html>


More information about the Devel mailing list