[Gambas-devel] ./reconf and/or ./reconf_all on svn

[Charlie Reinl]

Am Sonntag, den 19.11.2006, 17:47 +0100 schrieb ron:
> On Sunday 19 November 2006 13:29, Charlie Reinl wrote:
> 
> 
> > diff -N gambas2-svn/gb.qt.kde/config.log 
> > > gambas2-svnTest/gb.qt.kde/config.log 
> > 30,32c30,31
this was as root
> > < PATH: /sbin
> > < PATH: /bin
> > < PATH: /usr/sbin
> > ---
this was as user
> > > PATH: /usr/kde/3.5/bin
> > > PATH: /usr/local/bin
> > 33a33,42
> Is here the user changed from 'normal' to 'root' ?
> I'm not sure but thought the /sbin (and /usr/sbin) is only available to 'root'

What I know is, a user can execute programs in sbin like halt by calling with the hole path or entering into sbin
And root has sbin in his path$ so he can call halt from every where.

> > 42c51
> > < configure:2063: result: /bin/install -c
> > ---
> >
> > > configure:2063: result: /usr/bin/install -c
> >
> > 150c159
> > < configure:4672: result: /bin/install -c
> > ---
> >
> > > configure:4672: result: /usr/bin/install -c
> 
> This was the strange thing I did see.
> The 'install' location is different.
> On kubuntu6.10 & suse9.2 the 'install' is only in '/usr/bin'
> 
> The Test has found FF77 (fortran) also, this mean for me there is
> a major change done after the first svn checkout.
> 
> > The System for shur  its the same.
> ??? the Box yes but total installed software not.

No perhaps different access, both where compiled yesterday .

> > But user you are right, some times I start/started my script like su
> > -c ..., for not to be asked in the middle of the way for 'make install'
> 
> Here your difference for the rights as user/root?
> The ./configure as 'user' and with su -C as 'root'
> 
> example on my fresh Kubuntu:
> ron at ...544...:/sbin$ echo $PATH
> /usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/usr/games
> 
> root at ...544...:/home/ron# echo $PATH
> /sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/usr/games
> ^^^^^^^^^
> 
> I think this is the major reason for the difference.
> 
> My .2 cents
> 
> Ron

I made my svn today as user, without that silly idea to start the script
as root, and gb.qt.kde was compiled.

So the only thing I don't understand, is why the headers and includes
are not found.
What I also know, it was (is ?) for security reasons not good to run KED
as root.
Suse showed a red Desktop. Is that still so ?

Amicalment
Charlie