Re: Looks like time to integrate AI into the IDE, to stay relevant to future users

[Lee <t.lee.davidson@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 10/16/26 6:31 AM, André Loewen wrote:
> Never, ever mix a clearly designed and stable development (and production) tool like Gambas with constantly changing AI 
> approaches and models.
>
> My experience:
> Finding a bug in AI-generated code takes definitely longer than writing the code yourself from scratch.
> The opposite approach is much more efficient: handle the development 
> yourself, and use AI as a tool for troubleshooting and bug resolving.
>
> Or, use AI as a  'patient colleague' for drafting brief snippets, brainstorming approaches, or doing (reverse) documentation, 
> but keep yourself firmly in the driver's seat for the architecture and core code.
>
> Best regards
>
> André

This ↑↑

This only other use I can think of for AI in the Gambas ecosphere would be on the Wiki to help people find specific 
documentation and to help answer questions such as "How do I ...?"

I do use AI for research to save time sifting through resources, but I double-check its responses.


--
Lee

--- Gambas User List Netiquette [https://gambaswiki.org/wiki/doc/netiquette] ----
--- Gambas User List Archive [https://lists.gambas-basic.org/archive/user] ----