Re: Add option to set extension of executable off

[BB <adamnt42@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 21/7/26 10:13 pm, BB wrote:
> On 21/7/26 2:35 pm, Bruce Steers wrote:
> > It's not a good idea.
> >
> > If it does not have the .gambas extension then it is|included in the 
> > new archive| *<<<<---- important!*
> >
> >
> > I found it better to just add a symlink to launch it after installation
> >
> > Respects
> > BruceS
> I don't think there is any reasonable way for the builders to decide 
> that a binary file is the "previous" executable. So, unless it's 
> called <this_project>.gambas it can only be assumed to be some very 
> important data file.
>
> That's what I think anyway.
>
> b
oops. Sorry. Overzealous snipping.


b